Job Snijders wrote:
Follow-up question: without section 3.4 - would you still object?
I don't think that IXPs should be mentioned anywhere in this document.
For the general case of blackholing, an IXP is a clearing house so
should not get involved in the business of dropping its participants'
traffic. In the case of route servers, blackholing turns the IXP into a
legal target.
Nick