AFAICS the only new material is in the final paragraph, although the last
sentence is also apparently not new.
I would advise the IESG to not make a statement in parallel to BCP 79 since
alternative wording of the same material will create rather than remove
ambiguity. Say new things if they need to be said; revise BCP 79 if it needs to
be revised; but don't make statements that look like they are "talking for the
sake of talking."
Adrian
-----Original Message-----
From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of
IESG Secretary
Sent: 07 July 2016 21:21
To: IETF Announcement List
Subject: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
The IESG is considering an IESG statement on IPR Declarations, and would
like to solicit comments from the community on the proposed text. The
proposed text is provided below.
The IESG will make a decision about this matter shortly. Please provide
comments, if any, to ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org or to the IESG at
iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
before July 31, 2016.
——
IESG Statement on IPR Declarations:
BCP 79 discusses Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) within the IETF
process and technologies being worked on at the IETF.
Among other things, BCP 79 specifies how and when IPR disclosures ought
to be made. The purpose of such disclosures is to inform IETF
participants and those that use IETF technologies about IPR that may be
associated with the technology in question.
The IESG also observes that the IETF posts all IPR disclosures (other
than obvious spam, which is not an IPR disclosure), as they are
received, in our IPR disclosure database. This database is available at
https://www.ietf.org/ipr/.
However, as noted in BCP 79, the IETF will make no determination about
the validity of any particular IPR claim. Neither the IETF nor the IESG
makes any attempt to verify patent validity or the validity of any other
statements in the IPR disclosure text. As BCP 79, Sec. 4(B) indicates:
"The IESG disclaims any responsibility for identifying the
existence of or for evaluating the applicability of any IPR,
disclosed or otherwise, to any IETF technology, specification or
standard, and will take no position on the validity or scope of
any such IPR claims."
The material posted as IPR disclosures should be viewed as originating
from the source of that information, and any issue or question related
to the material should be directed to the source rather than the IETF.
There is no implied endorsement or agreement by the IETF or the IESG
with any of the material.