Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations

ietf

Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations

2016-07-13 01:03:51

On 7/8/2016 6:57 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

 would advise the IESG to not make a statement in parallel to BCP 79 since 
alternative wording of the same material will create rather than remove 
ambiguity.



+1

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, (continued) Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Eliot Lear Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, John C Klensin Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Barry Leiba Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, John C Klensin Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Jari Arkko Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Brian E Carpenter Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, John C Klensin Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Dave Crocker RE: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Adrian Farrel Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Brian E Carpenter Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Dave Crocker <= Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, joel jaeggli

Previous by Date:	Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10, Jari Arkko
Next by Date:	Re: IETF funding needs (Was: Re: IETF Endowment update), nalini.elkins
Previous by Thread:	Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, Brian E Carpenter
Next by Thread:	Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations, joel jaeggli
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]