ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I-D Action: draft-wilde-updating-rfcs-00.txt

2016-09-15 12:49:52
From the RFC Editor perspective, I’m hoping that this document will touch on 
more than just the IETF stream. Both the IAB and the Independent Submissions 
streams (but not the IRTF stream) contain Updates/Obsoletes. Not many, but they 
do exist and should be accounted for.

-Heather

On September 15, 2016 at 9:11:40 AM, Joel M. Halpern 
(jmh(_at_)joelhalpern(_dot_)com) wrote:

As the draft is probably about IETF process, not RFC Editor rules, I  
would think that ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org would be the venue for discussing the 
 
draft, unless Jari thinks it needs a separate list (which I doubt).  

Yours,  
Joel  

On 9/15/16 8:58 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:  
I noticed that as well in the announcement. The proper place to discuss  
this draft is most probably rfc-interest(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org  
<mailto:rfc-interest(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org> .  
 
Cheers,  
Andy  
 
 
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Brian E Carpenter  
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com 
<mailto:brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>> wrote:  
 
Note to Readers  
 
This draft should be discussed on the wgchairs mailing list [1].  
 
Um, no. That's a closed list.  
 
Regards  
Brian  
 
 

-- 
Heather Flanagan
RFC Series Editor

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg