Re: I-D Action: draft-wilde-updating-rfcs-00.txt

hello joel.

On 2016-09-15 17:13, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> As the draft is probably about IETF process, not RFC Editor rules, I
> would think that ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org would be the venue for discussing the
> draft, unless Jari thinks it needs a separate list (which I doubt).
ok, thanks for the feedback, and i have changed the recommended 
discussion list to be ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org.
thanks again and kind regards,

dret.

--
erik wilde | mailto:erik(_dot_)wilde(_at_)dret(_dot_)net |
           | http://dret.net/netdret    |
           | http://twitter.com/dret    |