Same thought. You are welcome
kalilou DAMA
Consultant
Lawyer & Business Advisor
phone +223 66 74 88 07
03 BP 237 Bamako - MALI
Le Mercredi 21 septembre 2016 20h40, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
<spencerdawkins(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> a écrit :
I agree with Barry and Joel on their suggestions.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Barry Leiba
<barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org> wrote:
On 9/19/16 7:48 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
This coordination issue with other organisations related to standards
is very important and affects pretty much our work, I suggest that the
General Area opens a WG for this important coordination, many
information are needed to be documented and focused on. IMHO, getting
information about contacts will help each IETF WG separately, but what
about the decisions for the whole IETF coordination with other SDOs
especially when we get more deep in future. Having contacts between
managers in SDOs is good start but usually in IETF our managers
decisions reform after looking into the IETF WG ideas and decisions.
Therefore, my suggestion is opening a discussion of why not future
coordination through WG? or is it right time? or do we need a new
work-process?
I don't know the answers, does any one know?
you should take a look at rfc 4052
And for IEEE in particular, at RFC 7241.
Barry
I'd note that the other SDOs that the IETF cooperated well with, while I was
still on the IAB and responsible for paying more attention to liaison
relationships in general, tended to be fairly open for individual
participation, and/or had participants who also participated in IETF.
If neither of those conditions holds, things get harder.
But this thread would be a good conversation to have with the IAB, who is
chartered with liaison oversight in RFC 2850, and have their own liaison
coordination program (details
at https://www.iab.org/activities/programs/iab-liaison-coordination-program/).
I'd start there, if I had ideas about IETF liaisons.
Spencer, speaking as a *former* IAB member
