I see only the name is taken by this draft, but totally different details.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: IPv10.
From: Tim Chown
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy"
CC: Khaled Omar ,"ipv6(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org " ,ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
IPv10 is taken already…
http://conferences.sigcomm.org/co-next/2009/workshops/rearch/papers/Carlberg.pdf
Tim
On 15 Nov 2016, at 06:01, Murray S. Kucherawy
<superuser(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com<mailto:superuser(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>> wrote:
Where's the draft?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Khaled Omar
<eng(_dot_)khaled(_dot_)omar(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com<mailto:eng(_dot_)khaled(_dot_)omar(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com>>
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is there anything we can add to the IPv10 draft or the standard will be the
same as the draft?
Best regards,
Khaled Omar
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ipv6(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------