On 11/22/2016 5:48 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
ps - on another note, why doesn't the SAAG have a datatracker page like
rtgwg?
Saag's not a WG. People suggest it now and then (and others
dislike the idea). Feel free to raise that too (though I'd
far prefer we discuss 3552bis myself.)
I didn't ask why SAAG is not a WG, I asked why it didn't have a
datatracker page. Not having a datatracker page makes it difficult to
track things that are associated only with the SAAG (e.g. the draft 3552
replacement). In the IETF meeting APP, I can't lookup "saag" in the wg
list to see what's what for the meeting for example and that appears to
be a directly related to SAAGs lack of datatracker presence.
E.g. - this is an administrative question for the ADs, not a "why don't
we have a working group question" for the community.
Mike