ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08

2016-12-27 23:23:56
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Has Nits

Hi,

QA review for "TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)
over IP" I-D:


Document: draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08.txt

Reviewer: Ines Robles

Review Date: December 28, 2016

Intended Status: Proposed Standard 


Summary:

 I believe the draft is technically good. I have some minor comments.


Comments:


        Major Issues:

                I have no “Major” issues with this I-D.

        Minor Issues and Nits:

                Section 1: Introduction

                        - I would add a reference to 
[draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08] when
IPv6 is mentioned.


                Section 2: Terminology

                        - In RBridge definition, I would add a reference to 
[RFC6325]

                        - In VNI definition, I would extend VXLAN - "...In 
Virtual
eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN) [RFC7348]..."


                Section 3: Use Cases for TRILL over IP

                        The text of the uses cases is clear. However, I think 
it would be
nice to add a graph for each use case like:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/slides/trill-13.pdf (Slide 4 and
5) 

                Section 4.5: TRILL Over IP IS-IS SubNetwork Point of Attachment

                        I think it would be nice to add in the text the meaning 
of "111111"
depicted in the figure.

                Section 8.1: Congestion Considerations

                        I would expand ECMP in the 3rd paragraph. 

                Section 9.2.3.2

                        I think it would be nice to add a reference to RFC 7172 
when
Inner.FGL is mentioned.

                Section 11.1: Port Assignments

                        I would add the registry for this request - "Service 
Name and
Transport Protocol Port Number Registry"
[https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml]



Thank you very much,

Ines.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>