Hi Joel,
I have submitted a new version (v-13) of the draft.
I have addressed your comment for IPv6 addresses format in the example.
Concerning your major comment, the discussion is leaded by Ben.
I hope I have correctly address your comment.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number/
Best regards,
Marianne
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Joel Halpern [mailto:jmh(_at_)joelhalpern(_dot_)com]
Envoyé : vendredi 16 décembre 2016 04:57
À : gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc : ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-
number(_dot_)all(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; dispatch(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Objet : Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Issues
Major:
This document defines a new code for use in SIP, and specifies new
behavior
both for the code itself and for its use in history-info. I am thus confused
as to
how this can be an informational RFC. It looks like it either Proposed
Standard
or experimental. Yes, I see that RFC 4458, which this updates is
Informational.
But just because we did it wrong before does not make that behavior correct
now. In addition to my understanding of the roles of different RFCs, I note
that
RFC 3969 and the IANA registry both state that this assignment must be made
by a standards track RFC.
Minor:
Given our emphasis on IPv6 over IPv4, would it not make sense for the
examples to use IPv6 addresses? (Inspired by the Id-Nits alert.)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.