IETF Discussion (date)
January 31, 2017
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Christer Holmberg, 13:39
- Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04, Dale Worley, 13:34
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, David Morris, 13:00
- Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Yogendra Pal (yogpal), 12:38
- RE: NomCom 2016-2017 - Announcement of IESG selections, Lucy Lynch, 11:28
- RE: NomCom 2016-2017 - Announcement of IESG selections, Adrian Farrel, 11:24
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Michael StJohns, 10:54
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Yoav Nir, 10:26
- NomCom 2016-2017 - Announcement of IESG selections, NomCom Chair 2016, 10:22
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05, tianxiang li, 10:00
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Eggert, Lars, 09:59
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Behcet Sarikaya, 09:48
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 07:47
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 07:41
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Mary B, 07:37
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 07:31
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 07:21
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Yoav Nir, 06:43
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Yoav Nir, 06:42
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Christer Holmberg, 06:17
- Re: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current Practice, Ralph Droms, 06:04
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Alexander Nevalennyy, 04:43
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 03:57
- RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, mohamed.boucadair, 03:50
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Mani, Mehdi, 03:49
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Naeem Khademi, 03:44
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko, 03:16
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 02:58
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Mani, Mehdi, 02:52
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Mani, Mehdi, 02:45
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Naeem Khademi, 02:35
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko, 01:48
- Re: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current Practice, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen, 01:22
January 30, 2017
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Matthew Kerwin, 23:36
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Dan Harkins, 23:29
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Arturo Servin, 20:33
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Randy Bush, 20:29
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Dan Harkins, 20:16
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Alejandro Acosta, 18:41
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Randy Bush, 17:38
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Brian E Carpenter, 17:29
- RE: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Bernie Volz (volz), 17:09
- Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Ted Lemon, 16:54
- Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, jouni.nospam, 16:20
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Emily Shepherd, 16:09
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:05
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Dan Harkins, 15:02
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Emily Shepherd, 14:41
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Dan Harkins, 14:15
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko, 14:13
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:02
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 13:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 13:57
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko, 13:40
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Rich Kulawiec, 13:37
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Paul Wouters, 12:51
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Saifi Khan, 12:39
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Christian de Larrinaga, 12:26
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Melinda Shore, 12:24
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, John C Klensin, 12:19
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:05
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Alia Atlas, 11:44
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Michael StJohns, 11:14
- Re: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current Practice, Ralph Droms, 10:56
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Melinda Shore, 10:54
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Niels ten Oever, 10:39
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Randy Bush, 10:30
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Walid AL-SAQAF, 10:27
- IACR: Condemning the U.S. Presidentʼs 2017-01-27 Executive Order, Paul Wouters, 08:45
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, nalini.elkins, 08:39
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, David Farmer, 08:32
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Rich Kulawiec, 07:12
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Niels ten Oever, 06:53
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Christer Holmberg, 06:46
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Leif Johansson, 06:43
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Dave Cridland, 06:41
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Stewart Bryant, 06:00
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Leif Johansson, 05:53
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Leif Johansson, 04:51
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Naeem Khademi, 04:51
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Naeem Khademi, 04:39
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Randy Bush, 04:02
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, John C Klensin, 02:57
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Melinda Shore, 00:20
- RE: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Roni Even, 00:03
January 29, 2017
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Brian E Carpenter, 22:15
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, nalini.elkins, 21:58
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jeffrey Altman, 21:50
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Melinda Shore, 21:38
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, George Michaelson, 20:09
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Rich Kulawiec, 19:43
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Dave Crocker, 19:40
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Stephen Farrell, 19:32
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko, 18:43
- Re: IETF attendance, S Moonesamy, 18:40
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, John Leslie, 18:13
- Re: IETF attendance, IETF Chair, 17:47
- IETF attendance, S Moonesamy, 16:18
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, John C Klensin, 13:53
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, James Seng, 13:09
- Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], should the IETF respond?, S Moonesamy, 11:39
- Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-08, Dale Worley, 10:27
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, nalini.elkins, 09:56
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Rich Kulawiec, 07:44
- Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05, Roni Even, 03:03
- Review of draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-04, Roni Even, 01:32
- Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-12, Roni Even, 01:30
- Re: Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05, Jari Arkko, 01:12
January 28, 2017
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Melinda Shore, 19:54
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Brian E Carpenter, 18:04
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Paul Wouters, 17:29
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Adam Roach, 16:35
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Emily Shepherd, 16:16
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:34
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Clint Chaplin, 12:21
- Gen-ART review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion, Stewart Bryant, 04:20
- Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05, Stewart Bryant, 04:14
- Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12, Stewart Bryant, 03:41
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses, Stewart Bryant, 03:35
January 27, 2017
- Re: Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12, jmh.direct, 17:01
- Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], should the IETF respond?, S Moonesamy, 15:51
- Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Ted Lemon, 15:25
- Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, jouni.nospam, 14:20
- Re: Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12, Ben Campbell, 14:17
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Melinda Shore, 14:08
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Hosnieh Rafiee, 13:53
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Andrew Sullivan, 13:43
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Warren Kumari, 13:41
- If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Dave Burstein, 13:29
- Re: I forget, were we supposed to report Cloudflare errors..., Jari Arkko, 12:42
- RE: Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12, marianne.mohali, 11:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick, 09:51
January 26, 2017
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- Re: I forget, were we supposed to report Cloudflare errors..., Randy Bush, 17:40
- I forget, were we supposed to report Cloudflare errors..., Adrian Farrel, 17:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Brian E Carpenter, 16:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Scott O. Bradner, 14:56
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, David Rudin (CELA), 14:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Scott O. Bradner, 14:42
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, David Rudin (CELA), 14:25
- Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Ted Lemon, 13:27
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, John C Klensin, 13:19
- RE: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Bernie Volz (volz), 13:18
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Randy Bush, 13:14
- Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, jouni.nospam, 12:58
- Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Ted Lemon, 12:37
- Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, jouni.nospam, 12:26
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Randy Bush, 11:09
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, John C Klensin, 11:08
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Randy Bush, 11:03
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Lee Howard, 10:12
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-07, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi), 08:06
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Bernie Volz (volz), 07:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant, 05:00
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Tomek Mrugalski, 04:25
- Re: Review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-11, Jari Arkko, 01:54
- Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02, Jouni Korhonen, 00:45
January 25, 2017
- Re: Multicast streaming video client, Ross Finlayson, 19:06
- Re: Multicast streaming video client, Ross Finlayson, 18:59
- Multicast streaming video client, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:49
- Review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-11, Brian Carpenter, 18:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Brian E Carpenter, 18:15
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Warren Kumari, 18:15
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:49
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-geojson-text-sequence-03.txt> (GeoJSON Text Sequences) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 17:43
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Mark Andrews, 14:48
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, joel jaeggli, 13:59
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Brian E Carpenter, 13:48
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Michal Krsek, 13:14
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Franck Martin, 13:07
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Randy Bush, 12:59
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11, Christer Holmberg, 12:43
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Matthew Pounsett, 12:28
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Paul Hoffman, 09:45
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11, Elwyn Davies, 09:14
- RE: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Adrian Farrel, 08:49
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Dave Crocker, 08:35
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, John C Klensin, 08:06
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11, Christer Holmberg, 07:41
- Review of draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-04, Lionel Morand, 07:28
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Marco Davids, 06:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant, 04:07
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Stewart Bryant, 02:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 01:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 01:43
- IPv4 Outage at Next IETF in Chicago., Khaled Omar, 01:28
January 24, 2017
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Mark Andrews, 22:15
- RE: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Michel Py, 21:49
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Mark Andrews, 21:40
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Franck Martin, 21:33
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 21:31
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Mark Andrews, 21:27
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Franck Martin, 21:24
- RE: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Michel Py, 21:11
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Jeffrey Eric Altman, 20:48
- RE: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Christian Huitema, 20:32
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 19:51
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Mark Andrews, 19:46
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Brian E Carpenter, 19:21
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Franck Martin, 19:05
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Jared Mauch, 18:53
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Brian E Carpenter, 18:33
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Mark Andrews, 17:56
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 17:44
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 17:44
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Franck Martin, 17:35
- Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Matthew Pounsett, 17:23
- IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago, Franck Martin, 17:11
- Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11, Elwyn Davies, 14:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 13:31
- Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-09, Joel Halpern, 12:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 11:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 10:40
- Review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10, Stewart Bryant, 10:22
- Routing Directorate Review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt, Stewart Bryant, 10:17
- RE: Last Call: <draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules-02.txt> (Variant Rules) to Informational RFC, Hollenbeck, Scott, 09:08
- Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15, Tim Wicinski, 06:29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 00:05
January 23, 2017
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 23:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 22:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 20:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 20:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 17:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 17:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 15:50
- Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-07, Dale Worley, 15:09
- Review of draft-ietf-geojson-text-sequence-03, Robert Sparks, 12:53
- Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Stewart Bryant, 12:52
- Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Stewart Bryant, 12:52
- Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Stewart Bryant, 12:51
- RE: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Mach Chen, 12:50
- RE: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Alexander Vainshtein, 12:49
- RE: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Adrian Farrel, 12:49
- Review of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator-06, Robert Sparks, 10:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 07:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Russ Housley, 06:40
- Re: What is Ant's Fit Protocol?, Alessandro Vesely, 05:27
January 22, 2017
- Re: What is Ant's Fit Protocol?, sandy, 16:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 13:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Scott O. Bradner, 13:31
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Brian E Carpenter, 13:31
- Re: What is Ant's Fit Protocol?, Warren Kumari, 13:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 12:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Russ Housley, 12:08
- Re: What is Ant's Fit Protocol?, sandy, 11:27
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 01:16
January 19, 2017
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08.txt> (Diameter Agent Overload and the Peer Overload Report) to Proposed Standard, Misha Zaytsev, 12:47
- Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 10:01
- RE: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg), 09:58
- Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 09:44
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Russ Housley, 09:10
- Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08.txt> (Diameter Agent Overload and the Peer Overload Report) to Proposed Standard, Misha Zaytsev, 07:19
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-03, Jari Arkko, 02:29
January 18, 2017
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr), 21:38
- Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Acee Lindem (acee), 16:52
- Re: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08, Anton Smirnov, 16:30
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-07, Jari Arkko, 15:53
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10, Jari Arkko, 15:15
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10, Jari Arkko, 15:09
- BOF preparations and involvement of the proponents in the lead up to BOF decisions, IETF Chair, 14:17
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 13:25
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04, Donald Eastlake, 13:16
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Stewart Bryant, 12:46
- Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08.txt> (Diameter Agent Overload and the Peer Overload Report) to Proposed Standard, Misha Zaytsev, 12:41
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Robert Sparks, 12:34
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 12:05
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 10:16
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 10:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant, 09:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 08:52
- ANRP award presentations at IETF-98, Eggert, Lars, 02:38
January 17, 2017
- RE: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08.txt> (Diameter Agent Overload and the Peer Overload Report) to Proposed Standard, Gunn, Janet P, 20:04
- Re: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11, Arun Arunachalam (carunach), 16:20
- Review of draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10, Peter Yee, 16:05
- RE: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08.txt> (Diameter Agent Overload and the Peer Overload Report) to Proposed Standard, Gunn, Janet P, 15:26
- Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08.txt> (Diameter Agent Overload and the Peer Overload Report) to Proposed Standard, Misha Zaytsev, 15:24
- Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08.txt> (Diameter Agent Overload and the Peer Overload Report) to Proposed Standard, Misha Zaytsev, 14:24
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, 10:39
- RFC Format Tools Development Contracts Awarded by IAOC, IETF Administrative Director, 10:06
- RFP for IETF Meeting Network Services, IETF Administrative Director, 10:06
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13, Robert Sparks, 09:21
- Guest blog post: A New RFC Archive, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor), 08:35
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04, Dan Romascanu, 02:46
January 16, 2017
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Loa Andersson, 22:00
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Terry Manderson, 21:49
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Loa Andersson, 21:44
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Terry Manderson, 21:33
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Adrian Farrel, 21:11
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Lou Berger, 20:18
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Terry Manderson, 19:50
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04, Donald Eastlake, 19:49
- Re: Last Call: <draft-harkins-owe-05.txt> (Opportunistic Wireless Encryption) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 15:29
- Re: [clue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10.txt> (Mapping RTP streams to CLUE Media Captures) to Proposed Standard, Paul Kyzivat, 14:01
- Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03, 神明達哉, 12:41
- Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03, 神明達哉, 12:30
- RE: Last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib, Adrian Farrel, 12:20
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 12:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-harkins-owe-05.txt> (Opportunistic Wireless Encryption) to Informational RFC, Daniel Harkins, 11:27
- Review of draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-08, Dan Romascanu, 10:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-harkins-owe-05.txt> (Opportunistic Wireless Encryption) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 10:36
- Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03, Charlie Perkins, 09:24
- Re: [clue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10.txt> (Mapping RTP streams to CLUE Media Captures) to Proposed Standard, Magnus Westerlund, 07:57
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Eliot Lear, 07:46
- Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03, Bernie Volz (volz), 07:18
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Alex Galis, 06:40
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Eliot Lear, 05:14
- RE: Last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib, Ryoo, Jeong-dong , 03:49
January 15, 2017
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr), 23:37
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03, Charlie Perkins, 23:09
- Re: Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-03, Julien ÉLIE, 14:01
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-03, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano, 13:25
- Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-04, Jouni Korhonen, 12:04
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Lorenzo Colitti, 09:55
- Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-06, Roni Even, 03:59
- RE: [clue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10.txt> (Mapping RTP streams to CLUE Media Captures) to Proposed Standard, Roni Even, 00:05
January 13, 2017
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, David Farmer, 22:35
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Brian E Carpenter, 21:34
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, John C Klensin, 21:07
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Fernando Gont, 15:03
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Mark Smith, 14:55
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, heasley, 14:04
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Brian E Carpenter, 13:58
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 13:55
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Fernando Gont, 13:46
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Fernando Gont, 13:45
- Re: AW: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Brian E Carpenter, 13:34
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 12:12
- Re: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-13, Ken Murchison, 11:45
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Adrian Farrel, 11:37
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Stewart Bryant, 11:26
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, John C Klensin, 11:17
- IETF 104 in Prague!, IETF Administrative Director, 11:04
- Re: [dispatch] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12, Cullen Jennings (fluffy), 10:47
- draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-13, Stewart Bryant, 10:27
- On the need for a secure software update protocol (Re: Software updates work (Was: Re: [97all] Reflections from IETF 97)), Michael Richardson, 10:25
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Sarah B, 10:15
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Stewart Bryant, 09:39
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing, Adrian Farrel, 08:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10.txt> (Mapping RTP streams to CLUE Media Captures) to Proposed Standard, Magnus Westerlund, 06:23
- Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-21, Dan Romascanu, 03:28
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Lorenzo Colitti, 01:41
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Randy Bush, 01:34
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Lorenzo Colitti, 01:31
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, sthaug, 01:17
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Randy Bush, 01:09
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Randy Bush, 01:03
January 12, 2017
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- AW: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Karsten Thomann, 23:10
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Suresh Krishnan, 21:56
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, heasley, 21:22
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Lorenzo Colitti, 20:38
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Brian E Carpenter, 19:56
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Randy Bush, 18:50
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Randy Bush, 18:49
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, David Farmer, 18:42
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Brian E Carpenter, 18:29
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Randy Bush, 17:26
- Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-06, Dale Worley, 15:29
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Bob Hinden, 15:24
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Bob Hinden, 15:23
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Bob Hinden, 14:52
- Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11, Dan Romascanu, 10:17
- Review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04, Dan Romascanu, 10:04
- IETF Hackathon in Chicago, IETF Chair, 05:24
January 11, 2017
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-03, kkinnear, 14:27
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Greg Mirsky, 12:36
- Some comments on draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19, Stewart Bryant, 11:20
- Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12, Robert Sparks, 09:48
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Brian Haberman, 09:32
- Software updates work (Was: Re: [97all] Reflections from IETF 97), IETF Chair, 08:37
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Punana Lebo, 08:26
- RE: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, James Gannon, 03:23
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10, Roni Even, 02:06
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14, mohamed.boucadair, 00:33
January 10, 2017
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 22:49
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Stephen Farrell, 20:49
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Andrew Sullivan, 20:34
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 20:13
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Stephen Farrell, 19:58
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Randy Bush, 19:53
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Andrew Sullivan, 19:43
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 19:37
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Bob Hinden, 18:48
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Bob Hinden, 16:58
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Andrew Sullivan, 15:06
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Andrew Sullivan, 15:04
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Bob Hinden, 14:47
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Andrew Sullivan, 14:19
- Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14, Jouni Korhonen, 14:04
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Donald Eastlake, 14:01
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-19.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 13:45
- Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06, Brian Haberman, 10:32
- RE: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11, Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group, 08:51
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, Sheng Jiang, 01:19
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, mohamed.boucadair, 01:17
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, Sheng Jiang, 00:49
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, mohamed.boucadair, 00:44
January 09, 2017
- Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, Sheng Jiang, 21:55
- Call for broader participation in IETF Tools work, IETF Chair, 13:45
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-03, Steve KENT, 11:40
- RE: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, Roni Even, 08:22
- RE: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, mohamed.boucadair, 06:24
- Bringing new ideas to the IETF and a reminder for BoF deadlines, IETF Chair, 06:04
- Review of draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-03, Dan Romascanu, 04:49
- RE: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, Roni Even, 04:37
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, mohamed.boucadair, 01:43
- Review of draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-03, Roni Even, 01:17
- Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11, Roni Even, 00:52
January 06, 2017
- Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11, Sean Turner, 20:56
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04.txt> (An Out-Of-Band Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services) to Proposed Standard, Rob Austein, 13:11
- Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03, Tatuya Jinmei, 13:09
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04.txt> (An Out-Of-Band Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services) to Proposed Standard, t.petch, 11:20
- RE: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15, Lucy yong, 09:47
- Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15, Ralph Droms, 07:14
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20, Randall Gellens, 06:55
- Re: [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-03, Jong-Hyouk Lee, 01:15
January 05, 2017
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20, Dan Romascanu, 13:54
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20, Randall Gellens, 13:12
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08, Joe Touch, 13:01
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08, Joe Touch, 12:45
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:04
- RE: [Ecrit] Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20, Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB), 09:18
- RE: Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05, Huaimo Chen, 09:05
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Leif Johansson, 08:58
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Eliot Lear, 07:46
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Leif Johansson, 07:35
- Reflections from IETF 97, IETF Chair, 07:28
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03, Jari Arkko, 06:46
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12, Randy Bush, 06:38
- Re: Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05, Jari Arkko, 06:37
- RE: [i2rs] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-09, Alexander Clemm, 06:21
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-03, Jari Arkko, 05:58
- Re: Genart LC review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-09, Jari Arkko, 05:57
- Re: [Idr] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11, Jari Arkko, 05:32
- Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20, Dan Romascanu, 05:14
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12, Randy Bush, 05:12
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-19, Jari Arkko, 05:10
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12, Jari Arkko, 04:59
January 04, 2017
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08, Donald Eastlake, 19:43
- Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13, Robert Sparks, 16:36
- Re: License File for Open Source Repositories, Nadeau Thomas, 15:27
- Re: Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-03, Julien ÉLIE, 14:36
- Re: [Insipid] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11, Stewart Bryant, 13:30
- Re: L7 protocol design, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:08
- Re: L7 protocol design, Joe Touch, 12:47
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 12:12
- Re: FW: License File for Open Source Repositories, Ted Hardie, 12:04
- Re: [Insipid] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11, Arun Arunachalam (carunach), 11:53
- Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-03, Jouni Korhonen, 10:24
- FW: License File for Open Source Repositories, IETF Chair, 10:20
- Internet Governance Forum (IGF) meeting in December 2016, IETF Chair, 07:58
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Stewart Bryant, 03:21
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Harald Alvestrand, 02:49
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Eliot Lear, 01:51
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Patrik Fältström, 01:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-06.txt> (RSVP-TE Signaling Procedure for End-to-End GMPLS Restoration and Resource Sharing) to Informational RFC, Sarah Kiden, 00:17
January 03, 2017
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 18:23
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Tony Finch, 18:14
- Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05, Orit Levin, 18:12
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 18:08
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Tony Finch, 18:00
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Philip Homburg, 17:33
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 17:29
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 17:22
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Tony Finch, 17:14
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 16:55
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 16:49
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Patrik Fältström, 16:47
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:34
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Tony Finch, 16:33
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Paul Eggert, 15:59
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:57
- Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases, Glen, 15:52
- Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases, Viktor Dukhovni, 15:43
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 15:26
- RE: Problem with the draft-all aliases, Adrian Farrel, 15:22
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 15:21
- Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases, Robert Sparks, 15:20
- Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases, Viktor Dukhovni, 14:55
- Problem with the draft-all aliases, Christian Huitema, 14:39
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Tony Finch, 14:35
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Tony Finch, 14:22
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:09
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:07
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 14:02
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Cyrus Daboo, 13:55
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Pete Resnick, 13:49
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:47
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, John C Klensin, 13:25
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 13:10
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Eliot Lear, 13:03
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08, Joe Touch, 12:57
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Stewart Bryant, 12:55
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Ted Lemon, 12:52
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:39
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Cyrus Daboo, 12:39
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Stewart Bryant, 12:35
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Stewart Bryant, 12:30
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 12:27
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Stewart Bryant, 12:25
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 12:25
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Cyrus Daboo, 12:03
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:43
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:28
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Stewart Bryant, 11:27
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Jared Mauch, 11:07
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Cyrus Daboo, 11:03
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:33
- Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-19, Dale Worley, 10:15
- Genart LC review: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11, Stewart Bryant, 09:11
- Genart LC review: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-11, Stewart Bryant, 09:03
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-07, Joel M. Halpern, 08:18
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Tony Finch, 08:08
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08, Ines Robles, 05:32
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-07, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr), 02:36
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Eliot Lear, 01:25
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Patrik Fältström, 00:59
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Eliot Lear, 00:43
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Patrik Fältström, 00:29
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 00:24
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 00:12
- Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-05, Roni Even, 00:11