ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice

2017-01-30 13:57:32
from [Jari Arkko] [Permanent Link] 

Pete:

Thanks for your careful read and comparisons.

I have read through your suggestions and agree with all of them.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko
Next by Date:  RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
Previous by Thread:  Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick
Next by Thread:  Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]