Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02

On Jan 30, 2017, at 5:20 PM, jouni.nospam 
<jouni(_dot_)nospam(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
> Now if I decide to implement rfc3315bis *with* security, follow all musts in 
> Section 20.1, and listed “updates” in the header, I have still no guarantee 
> whether I can interoperate with another rfc3315bis implementation because it 
> decided to follow relay-server-security. That is not good.
Thanks.   This is the clarification I was looking for.