Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

On 1/28/17 3:03 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Which is *exactly* why getting to consensus on 
> draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
> is the most urgent matter, and it's happening at mtgvenue(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
> right now.
Yes.  We're trying to close out the process document but we're aware
that conditions have changed and that that's likely to have an impact
on how the draft will be interpreted.  For better or worse, how we
move issues along in the IETF is by working on document text, and that's
what's needed here.  Unfortunately this discussion hasn't led to new
comments on the draft yet.  I do wish people would give it a read
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process/?include_text=1)
and take comments to the mtgvenue list.

Thanks,

Melinda
(mtgvenue co-chair)

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature