Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

ietf

Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

2017-01-27 14:08:14

On 1/27/17 10:43 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

I note that there is a WG, MTGVENUE, that is working on criteria for
meeting venues.  It seems to me that discussing the overall question
of specific exclusions at a venue for individuals on the basis of some
set of class properties (whether it be nationality, religion, choices
in emotional relationships, or whatever) would be appropriate in that
WG.  Moreover, since the WG hasn't finished its work perhaps the WG
list would be better to explore the issue than the IETF list.


Indeed, and the question of whether what's currently in the draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process/?include_text=1)
on that question is sufficient is currently under discussion.  Note
that the goal is to provide guidance from the IETF to the IAOC on
questions like this.

Melinda

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, (continued) Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, John C Klensin Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Christian de Larrinaga Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Melinda Shore Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Rich Kulawiec Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jeffrey Altman Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Brian E Carpenter Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Andrew Sullivan Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Hosnieh Rafiee Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], should the IETF respond?, S Moonesamy Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Melinda Shore <= Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Clint Chaplin Message not available Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], should the IETF respond?, S Moonesamy Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Saifi Khan Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Paul Wouters Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Brian E Carpenter Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Naeem Khademi Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Jari Arkko

Previous by Date:	Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Hosnieh Rafiee
Next by Date:	Re: Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12, Ben Campbell
Previous by Thread:	Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], should the IETF respond?, S Moonesamy
Next by Thread:	Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?, Clint Chaplin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]