On 25/01/2017 21:53, Stewart Bryant wrote:
On 24/01/2017 23:11, Franck Martin wrote:
I think it is time to move to the next level of IPv6 deployment.
Ideally the IETF WiFi network should now only provide the following 2
networks:
1)IPv6-only
2)IPv6-only with NAT64
The later should be the default network.
However you would say, well some stuff will break, some non technical
people will use the IETF network and may have a bad experience, etc...
So to be conservative but at the same time futurist and like it was
done a few years back, why not create again an IPv4 outage of a few
hours where the above 2 networks would be the only networks available?
Depending on results, this outage could be expanded to a full day at
the following meeting, until the IPv4 network is totally removed from
the WiFi?
How about those that designed IPv6 and their ADs subject themselves to
this regime and report to the rest of us how they got on?
I've helped a bit, and I exercise the model suggested by RFC1671
most days. It works. I see no reason to subject myself to an artificial
restriction.
Brian