I've reviewed draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-19. Thank you to the authors and the
WG for considering the input from my earlier reviews and careful revision of
the document to address that input.
In general, I think the document is now almost ready for publication. The
major points from my review of -17 have been addressed.
I do have a few minor points for the authors and WG to consider:
Does the WG have consensus that IPv6 address selection, prefix advertisement,
and the details of ND need not be addressed in this document?
I don't see a default value for EB_PERIOD defined anywhere. Is such a
definition needed?
Section 5.2 requires implementation of RPL non-storing mode and recommends
implementation of storing mode. How does a node know whether RPL is being used
in non-storing or storing mode?
- Ralph