ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fwd: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity

2017-02-08 08:51:28
FWIW ...

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Andrew Sullivan 
<ajs(_at_)anvilwalrusden(_dot_)com>
wrote:

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:52:00PM +0000, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

Agreed. JMAP and IMAP are likely to co-exist for long time.


Isn't that exactly the complaint?  Something like, "Long periods of
co-existence need to have lots of benefits or an existential one, or
else they're not a good idea."


Andrew didn't point this out, but since TSVAREA has been paying attention
to it for the past couple of IETF cycles, the IAB does have
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-protocol-transitions/ in active
development.

We're finding it helpful. Your mileage may vary, of course.

Spencer