ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard

2017-02-10 19:32:47
On 11/02/2017 14:12, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Feb 10, 2017, at 8:02 PM, Randy Bush <randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com> wrote:
excuse?  this is why we have ietf last call.

No, we do not have IETF last call so that people who participated in the 
working group discussion can re-litigate the points they lost on in the 
working group discussion.

I was fairly specific when I raised the issue at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/myyPO9b4dYfYeGQrdPjTNzIHArY

I do not dispute that this sentence reached WG consensus. However, I want
to ask if it has IETF consensus.

If people who were not involved in the 6man debate have opinions, it would
be useful to hear from them. I agree that there is no point in the same
people repeating the same arguments.

     Brian

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>