On Feb 16, 2017, at 00:45, Randy Bush <randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com> wrote:
If your statement is that we only have the 64 bit boundary because of
SLAAC I believe you are wrong.
cite, please. what else actually needs it?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7421
that excuses it. cite where it is actually needed to do something
useful other than slaac.
RFC 6282 compresses IPv6 headers over IEEE 802.15.4 in a way that depends on
such networks always having 64-bit network prefix length.
--james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)google(_dot_)com <mailto:jhw(_at_)google(_dot_)com>>