ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard

2017-02-17 12:01:09
from [Stewart Bryant] [Permanent Link] 
Ole

Are you saying:
A correct implementation of RFC2460 MUST NOT insert an EH at any point along the path other than at the packet source. 

Or
A correct implementation of RFC2460 MAY insert an EH at any point along the path.
Either way, why not add that line to the text to remove any possible ambiguity in interpretation? 

- Stewart
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard, Scott O. Bradner
Next by Date:  Re: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard, Paul Hoffman
Previous by Thread:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard, Joel M. Halpern
Next by Thread:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard, otroan
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]