Dear Mehmet,
We've had parallel threads to address this agenda conflict.
GROW and NETMOD chairs kindly accepted to swap their slot (Monday
afternoon session III / Thursday afternoon session III). Request has
been handled by the OPS ADs, IETF Secretariat is informed/tasked.
Hope this will address the issue.
Thanks,
Best regards, Laurent.
On 01/03/2017 16:05, Mehmet Ersue wrote:
Same did NETCONF co-chairs.
Cheers,
Mehmet
-----Original Message-----
From: Eggert, Lars [mailto:lars(_at_)netapp(_dot_)com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 10:07 AM
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Cc: IETF Agenda <agenda(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
On 2017-2-25, at 17:01, Mehmet Ersue <mersue(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
I would like to ask to avoid an overlapping of nmrg with OPS area WGs.
Please tell the respective chairs to list those conflicts when requesting
the
slots. For example, NMRG listed:
First Priority: sdnrg nfvrg anima opsarea Second Priority: netmod netconf
nmlrg irtfopen
Lars
--
Laurent Ciavaglia
Nokia, Bell Labs
+33 160 402 636
route de Villejust - Nozay, France
linkedin.com/in/laurent.ciavaglia