IETF Discussion (date)
March 31, 2017
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, Stewart Bryant, 18:58
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, Ross Finlayson, 15:32
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Martin Rex, 14:28
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 13:35
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 13:19
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 13:14
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Suresh Krishnan, 13:09
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 12:57
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Suresh Krishnan, 12:47
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 12:01
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, Paul Wouters, 12:00
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, tom p., 11:40
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, Eliot Lear, 11:09
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, Randy Bush, 10:55
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, Bob Hinden, 10:42
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction-04, Dan Romascanu, 10:39
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Suresh Krishnan, 10:32
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, Laurent Ciavaglia, 10:23
- Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities, Eliot Lear, 09:42
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 09:12
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option-09, Jouni Korhonen, 08:46
- Nominations sought: Jonathan B. Postel Service Award 2017, IETF Administrative Director, 08:35
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 02:11
March 30, 2017
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Jen Linkova, 17:14
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Tim Chown, 17:00
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 16:50
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 16:13
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, otroan, 16:06
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 15:56
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse, Sandra Murphy, 15:50
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, otroan, 15:48
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 15:45
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Mark Smith, 15:25
- RE: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Ackermann, Michael, 15:21
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Tim Chown, 14:28
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Tim Chown, 14:26
- Reminder: Bad Attitude PechaKucha in Chicago -- TONIGHT!, Aaron Falk, 14:04
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse, Warren Kumari, 14:02
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 13:53
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, 神明達哉, 13:20
- RE: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 12:01
- RE: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Ackermann, Michael, 11:54
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 11:53
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata), 11:14
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 10:59
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Suresh Krishnan, 10:48
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 10:31
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 10:11
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction-04, Yaron Sheffer, 09:53
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Suresh Krishnan, 08:30
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Jeff Tantsura, 08:12
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 07:45
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Leddy, John, 06:07
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Mark Townsley, 04:39
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Mark Townsley, 04:31
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Julian Reschke, 00:39
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Tim Chown, 00:10
March 29, 2017
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Leddy, John, 21:59
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Yoav Nir, 17:04
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Dave Crocker, 16:44
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Yoav Nir, 16:40
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Harald Alvestrand, 16:35
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Dave Crocker, 16:26
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Matthew Kerwin, 16:19
- IETF Trust report updates, Tobias Gondrom, 16:02
- Robert Steele: Details on NSA Backdoor in INTEL Chips, willi uebelherr, 13:35
- Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-08, fujiwara, 11:31
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Nico Williams, 10:57
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Nico Williams, 10:54
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Nico Williams, 10:46
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Nico Williams, 10:41
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 09:45
- IETF 99 Registration, Hotel Reservations, Social Ticket Sales Open!, IETF Secretariat, 09:06
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Yoav Nir, 08:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-07.txt> (Effect of Pervasive Encryption) to Informational RFC, Warren Kumari, 08:55
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Dave Crocker, 08:29
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, John C Klensin, 08:12
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Dave Crocker, 07:34
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Yoav Nir, 07:20
- Getting the latest version of an RFC specification, Dave Crocker, 06:51
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Patrik Fältström, 00:52
March 28, 2017
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 16:37
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 15:29
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Tony Finch, 15:24
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 14:19
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Nico Williams, 14:17
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Michael Breuer, 14:10
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 12:49
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Nico Williams, 12:39
- secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse, Sandra Murphy, 11:34
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22, Christer Holmberg, 11:01
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction-04, Andrew G. Malis, 07:53
- Review of draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction-04, Jürgen Schönwälder, 02:35
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Patrik Fältström, 01:38
- Re: IAB Selects Ted Hardie as new IAB Chair, Patrik Fältström, 00:55
- Education and Mentoring Directorate, IETF Chair, 00:18
March 27, 2017
- Employer support (was Re: Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017), Andrew Sullivan, 18:01
- RE: Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017, Adrian Farrel, 17:48
- Re: Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017, Alia Atlas, 17:45
- Re: Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017, Barry Leiba, 17:43
- Re: Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017, George Michaelson, 16:28
- Re: Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017, Michael Richardson, 16:17
- Report out from the NomCom 2016-2017, NomCom Chair 2016, 15:24
- Re: Predictable Internet Time, Joe Touch, 14:35
- New Room: Video Streaming Bar BoF (now in March), Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal), 13:12
- Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-08, Jouni Korhonen, 12:50
- New Room: Video Streaming Bar BoF, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal), 11:35
- www.ietf.org revamp project update, The IESG, 10:18
March 26, 2017
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard, Bob Hinden, 21:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard, Gorry Fairhurst, 19:55
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard, Bob Hinden, 16:23
- RE: Video Streaming Bar BoF @ IETF98, Lucas Pardue, 14:07
- IAB report to the community before IETF 98, IAB Chair, 09:58
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, John C Klensin, 04:12
March 24, 2017
- Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Joe Touch, 22:09
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Pete Resnick, 21:04
- Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and a request, John Levine, 20:19
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, John R Levine, 19:50
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Michael Richardson, 18:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard, Gorry Fairhurst, 18:06
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Joe Touch, 17:25
- IAOC membership (was: Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request), Dave Crocker, 16:47
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Pete Resnick, 16:32
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Brian E Carpenter, 16:22
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Nico Williams, 14:45
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Pete Resnick, 14:41
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, John Levine, 14:41
- Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22, Carlos Pignataro, 14:40
- IESG summary report, IETF Chair, 14:39
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Michael Richardson, 14:15
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Brian E Carpenter, 13:14
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Jari Arkko, 12:53
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Pete Resnick, 11:47
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Scott O. Bradner, 11:33
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, John C Klensin, 11:27
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Scott Bradner, 08:55
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Randy Bush, 08:49
- RE: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Michael Cameron, 08:41
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Scott Bradner, 08:39
- RE: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Michael Cameron, 08:35
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Scott Bradner, 08:30
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Randy Bush, 08:26
- IETF-98 Highlights, IETF Chair, 08:21
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request, Angela, 01:24
- IETF subpoena processes update and a request, IETF Chair, 01:07
March 22, 2017
- Re: Bad Attitude PechaKucha in Chicago -- Schedule & location, Aaron Falk, 15:10
- Bad Attitude PechaKucha in Chicago -- Schedule & location, Aaron Falk, 13:53
- Re: Video Streaming Bar BoF @ IETF98, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal), 13:50
- FW: Video Streaming Bar BoF @ IETF98, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal), 13:38
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings, 13:37
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Paul Kyzivat, 11:26
- Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07, Jana Iyengar, 00:21
- Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07, Yoav Nir, 00:15
- Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07, Jana Iyengar, 00:10
March 21, 2017
- Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04, Peter Yee, 22:44
- RE: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07, Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong), 21:05
- Re: Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Denis Ovsienko, 19:23
- Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-isis-mi-bis-01.txt> (IS-IS Multi-Instance) to Proposed Standard, Burmaa Baasansuren, 19:20
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18, Harald Alvestrand, 17:10
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Dale R. Worley, 14:52
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Adam Roach, 12:49
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-15.txt> (Routing Key Chain YANG Data Model) to Proposed Standard, Acee Lindem (acee), 12:47
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 12:44
- RE: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Asveren, Tolga, 12:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 12:14
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Alan Johnston, 12:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Adam Roach, 11:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 11:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-15.txt> (Routing Key Chain YANG Data Model) to Proposed Standard, tom p., 11:49
- IETF Journal: Latest issue now available, IETF Journal, 11:30
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Ranjit Avasarala, 11:24
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Henning Schulzrinne, 11:18
- Seeking IETF input for the future Aeronautical Telecommunications Network, Templin, Fred L, 11:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 10:51
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 09:54
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Adam Roach, 09:42
- Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07, Yoav Nir, 03:03
March 20, 2017
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Paul Kyzivat, 21:39
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Paul Kyzivat, 21:39
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Dale R. Worley, 19:08
- final cfp: Bad Attitude PechaKucha in Chicago, Aaron Falk, 16:58
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, A. Jean Mahoney, 14:57
- Opening IETF 99 Registration, IETF Secretariat, 14:10
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-05, Greg Mirsky, 12:34
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04, Stewart Bryant, 12:01
- Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review, Rich Kulawiec, 11:05
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Dale R. Worley, 09:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard, Denis Ovsienko, 04:46
- Re: Operational feedback on PMTUD, Masataka Ohta, 00:51
March 17, 2017
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04, Bob Hinden, 16:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard, Bob Hinden, 16:57
- Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-05, Jon Mitchell, 14:01
- Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18, Jon Mitchell, 13:18
- anybody working on Socks5 RFC, Hosnieh Rafiee, 12:24
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Robert Raszuk, 12:07
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Christer Holmberg, 10:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Ben Campbell, 10:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Christer Holmberg, 10:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley, 09:48
March 16, 2017
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-08, Joel Halpern, 19:58
- Re: IETF 98 Final Agenda, Mark Andrews, 19:01
- NomCom 2016-2017: ART AD II (Vacancy 2017), NomCom Chair 2016, 15:43
- RE: IETF 98 Final Agenda, Arleen Elliott, 10:38
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-13, Jari Arkko, 09:04
- Review of draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11, Vijay Gurbani, 08:28
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Leddy, John, 07:41
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Stewart Bryant, 05:53
- Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18, Lionel Morand, 04:46
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, otroan, 03:12
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17, Leif Johansson, 03:08
- Review of draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08, Shucheng LIU, 00:12
March 15, 2017
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Xing Li, 20:12
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Brandon Long, 19:54
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17, Jari Arkko, 19:22
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Tim Chown, 18:32
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Mark Smith, 15:40
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Joe Touch, 15:35
- Fwd: Web Foundation responds to India consultation on net neutrality, willi uebelherr, 14:47
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 13:59
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Fernando Gont, 13:49
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Joe Touch, 13:15
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Joe Touch, 13:14
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Voyer, Daniel, 12:58
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, 神明達哉, 12:17
- Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09, Daniel Franke, 11:47
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Leddy, John, 11:33
- Re: [IoT-DIR] Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04, Ines Robles, 11:32
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Tim Chown, 11:22
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Brian E Carpenter, 11:17
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Rich Kulawiec, 10:57
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi), 10:55
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-21, Sean Turner, 10:45
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Nico Williams, 10:35
- Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17, Pete Resnick, 09:38
- RE: Last call feedback: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt, Badri.Subramanyan, 06:20
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Philip Homburg, 06:00
- Operational feedback on PMTUD, Masataka Ohta, 05:57
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04, Tim Chown, 05:38
March 14, 2017
- IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08, Suresh Krishnan, 21:47
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Brandon Long, 18:54
- Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11, Dale Worley, 17:17
- RE: Last call feedback: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL), 17:02
- Good but not-quite-trivial change in auth-48 for draft-harkins-owe, Stephen Farrell, 16:01
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Martin Rex, 14:24
- Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04, Ines Robles, 14:09
- RE: The CIA mentions us, Tony Hain, 13:50
- Re: The CIA mentions us, willi uebelherr, 12:52
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, John Cowan, 08:59
- Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-07, Stewart Bryant, 06:40
- Review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-08, Stewart Bryant, 06:22
- Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-13, Stewart Bryant, 06:08
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Philip Homburg, 05:39
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Tim Chown, 04:46
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, John R Levine, 04:43
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17, Leif Johansson, 04:17
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Tim Chown, 03:54
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 03:53
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, John R Levine, 02:43
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Yoav Nir, 01:42
March 13, 2017
- Re: The CIA mentions us, willi uebelherr, 23:58
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Christopher Morrow, 23:08
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Viktor Dukhovni, 21:56
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 21:42
- Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, Jared Mauch, 18:31
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:13
- Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?, John R Levine, 17:51
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Philip Homburg, 16:21
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Brandon Long, 16:05
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Philip Homburg, 15:22
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Carsten Bormann, 14:57
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Julian Reschke, 14:52
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Viktor Dukhovni, 14:47
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Carsten Bormann, 14:14
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Carsten Bormann, 14:08
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Dave Crocker, 13:21
- Re: [secdir] [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Nico Williams, 13:16
- Review of draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-10, Robert Sparks, 12:58
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Matthew A. Miller, 12:56
- Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11, Matthew Miller, 12:45
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., John R Levine, 12:43
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Carsten Bormann, 12:28
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Dave Crocker, 12:21
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., Carsten Bormann, 12:03
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Peter Cordell, 11:40
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Stefan Hagen, 11:02
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Carsten Bormann, 10:56
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Ted Lemon, 10:02
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Julian Reschke, 03:15
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Julian Reschke, 01:24
March 12, 2017
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Elwyn Davies, 18:38
- Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Wei Chuang, 16:41
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Rich Kulawiec, 12:35
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Carsten Bormann, 11:50
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, ned+ietf, 07:20
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Julian Reschke, 04:30
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Carsten Bormann, 04:10
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Peter Cordell, 04:06
- Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-08, Roni Even, 01:55
March 10, 2017
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04, Donald Eastlake, 22:40
- Re: The CIA mentions us, joel jaeggli, 21:02
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:11
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, John Cowan, 20:09
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Stephen Farrell, 20:03
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Jari Arkko, 17:48
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Bob Hinden, 16:53
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Ted Lemon, 15:47
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Jari Arkko, 14:13
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:50
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Dave Cridland, 11:15
- Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-04, Joel Halpern, 11:14
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Michael Richardson, 08:27
- RE: Last call feedback: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt, Badri.Subramanyan, 01:36
March 09, 2017
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- Re: The CIA mentions us, willi uebelherr, 20:49
- Re: Review of draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-02, Barry Leiba, 16:09
- Conclusion of the facilitators experiment, IETF Chair, 16:08
- Review of draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-02, Robert Sparks, 16:03
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Vinayak Hegde, 15:18
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:11
- Re: The CIA mentions us, John C Klensin, 15:03
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Jari Arkko, 14:36
- Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Wei Chuang, 12:23
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:29
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:20
- RE: Last call feedback: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt, Badri.Subramanyan, 08:19
- Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, tom p., 03:36
- Final version of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis, Jari Arkko, 03:10
March 08, 2017
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Benjamin Kaduk, 23:54
- Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 21:19
- RE: [I2nsf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11.txt> (I2NSF Problem Statement and Use cases) to Proposed Standard, Susan Hares, 19:36
- Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Wei Chuang, 19:17
- Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 17:28
- Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Wei Chuang, 17:07
- IETF hackathon - Register and Add your Projects NOW!, Charles Eckel (eckelcu), 12:22
- Re: [Json] Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard, Julian Reschke, 12:11
- Re: IETF Hackathon98 - remote presentation, Charles Eckel (eckelcu), 11:53
- Re: IETF Hackathon98 - remote presentation, Charles Eckel (eckelcu), 11:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard, Matthew Miller, 11:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard, Julian Reschke, 11:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard, Matthew Miller, 11:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard, Julian Reschke, 10:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell, 10:22
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15, Stephen Farrell, 08:36
- IETF Hackathon98 - remote presentation, lavanyahm, 03:36
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Carsten Bormann, 02:50
- Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Julian Reschke, 01:47
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Julian Reschke, 01:40
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-07, Roni Even, 00:40
March 07, 2017
- Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-12, Jon Mitchell, 23:51
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Benjamin Kaduk, 21:30
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Barry Leiba, 20:52
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:03
- secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Benjamin Kaduk, 19:48
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04, Suresh Krishnan, 18:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 16:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 15:16
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?, Alex Jordan, 14:37
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Brian E Carpenter, 13:33
- Re: More haste, less speed., Joe Touch, 13:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley, 13:11
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Fernando Gont, 12:47
- Re: The CIA mentions us, David Morris, 12:35
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Fernando Gont, 12:32
- Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Stephen Farrell, 12:29
- Re: [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-08, Randall Gellens, 11:55
- Re: The CIA mentions us, joel jaeggli, 10:23
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:16
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:12
- Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:10
- Re: The CIA mentions us, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:04
- Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Andrew Sullivan, 10:00
- The CIA mentions us, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:55
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-07, Steve Donovan, 09:47
- Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Stewart Bryant, 09:46
- Re: [RTG-DIR] [spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi), 09:44
- Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:12
- RE: [RTG-DIR] [spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03, Susan Hares, 09:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 07:08
- RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, mohamed.boucadair, 07:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 06:08
- Re: [spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi), 05:21
- Re: [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-08, Gunnar Hellström, 04:18
- Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:09
- RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, mohamed.boucadair, 01:32
March 06, 2017
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Eric Rescorla, 22:29
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Brian E Carpenter, 22:20
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Eric Rescorla, 22:07
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Eric Rescorla, 22:02
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04, Susan Hares, 21:52
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Michael Richardson, 21:33
- Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-08, Mahesh Jethanandani, 20:47
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04, Bob Hinden, 19:39
- Re: More haste, less speed., Viktor Dukhovni, 16:01
- Re: More haste, less speed., Gary E. Miller, 15:40
- Re: More haste, less speed., Viktor Dukhovni, 15:30
- Re: More haste, less speed., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:12
- Re: More haste, less speed., Viktor Dukhovni, 12:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, Ted Hardie, 11:15
- Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Khaled Omar, 11:02
- Re: [spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03, Robert Raszuk, 10:56
- Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Ted Lemon, 10:43
- Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-08, Matthew Miller, 10:42
- Review of draft-harkins-owe-05, Matthew Miller, 10:39
- Review of draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-04, Matthew Miller, 10:37
- Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda., Khaled Omar, 10:32
- Review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-chacha20-poly1305-04, Matthew Miller, 10:30
- More haste, less speed., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:27
- Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03, Susan Hares, 10:25
- Re: Remote Mentors Needed for Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh, nalini.elkins, 08:37
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:05
- RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, mohamed.boucadair, 03:48
- Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10, Roni Even, 03:46
- Re: Remote Mentors Needed for Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh, Sankalp Bagaria, 03:06
March 03, 2017
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-04.txt, Greg Mirsky, 18:57
- RE: Review of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-10, Black, David, 18:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, Ted Hardie, 17:49
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03, Joel M. Halpern, 17:13
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03, Greg Mirsky, 16:46
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?, Alex Jordan, 15:23
- Review of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-08, Colin Perkins, 11:37
- Review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Elwyn Davies, 11:06
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, John C Klensin, 08:23
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Julian Reschke, 06:52
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, tom p., 06:40
- Review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-06, Stewart Bryant, 05:20
- Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-06, Stewart Bryant, 05:15
- RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, mohamed.boucadair, 03:24
March 02, 2017
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, narten, 23:53
- Conclusion of last calls for RFC2460bis, RFC4291bis, and RFC1981bis, Suresh Krishnan, 23:28
- Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03, Joel Halpern, 22:45
- Remote hubs for IETF 98: Zurich, IETF Chair, 16:48
- Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., willi uebelherr, 14:09
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Warren Kumari, 13:40
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Re: Mailing list membership., willi uebelherr, 13:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, Ted Hardie, 12:03
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?, Ted Hardie, 10:34
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Joe Touch, 10:03
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Michael Richardson, 08:19
- RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC, mohamed.boucadair, 03:17
- Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-21, Shucheng LIU, 02:36
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14, Jari Arkko, 02:31
- Review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03, Jürgen Schönwälder, 02:22
- Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-07, Shucheng LIU, 00:54
March 01, 2017
- Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?, Alex Jordan, 23:51
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Re: Mailing list membership., S Moonesamy, 23:31
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Carsten Bormann, 20:09
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Michael Richardson, 20:05
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Re: Mailing list membership., willi uebelherr, 19:39
- Re: Mailing list membership., Miles Fidelman, 19:04
- Re: Mailing list membership., Barry Leiba, 18:36
- Re: Mailing list membership., Carsten Bormann, 18:35
- Re: Mailing list membership., willi uebelherr, 18:14
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Joe Touch, 16:48
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Patrick McManus, 15:42
- yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership., John Levine, 15:01
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, John C Klensin, 14:22
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, ned+ietf, 14:14
- Re: Mailing list membership., David Morris, 13:34
- Re: Mailing list membership., willi uebelherr, 13:29
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Brian E Carpenter, 13:24
- Re: Mailing list membership., Carsten Bormann, 13:22
- Re: Mailing list membership., Michael StJohns, 13:18
- Re: Mailing list membership., Bob Hinden, 13:14
- Re: Mailing list membership., Michael StJohns, 12:56
- Re: Mailing list membership., Kazunori ANDO, 12:53
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Patrick McManus, 11:13
- Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Kathleen Moriarty, 10:10
- RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?, Michael Richardson, 10:04
- Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda, Laurent Ciavaglia, 09:47
- RE: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda, Mehmet Ersue, 09:06
- RE: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda, Mehmet Ersue, 09:04