Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Has Nits
I think would be ready if it passed IDnits. I found the document good
read and found no sinkholes in it. Pointing up two implementations was
also great.
The Proto Write-up seems not be up to date with what IDnits says e.g.,
when it comes to downrefs, which is what the IDnits complain about.
A couple of editorials:
Lines 118-119 says: "This takes this.." I would reword to something
like:
"This document takes using NXDOMAIN information for more effective
caching further."
Lines 396 and 397 uses "is NOT" and "IS making". I would use lower
case here. No reason to use capitalized and still non-RFC2119
language.
Line 407 is would be great to indicate since which version of Unbound
support has been in place.