ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard

2017-03-17 10:30:57
Hi,

I will change it to the IESG address :)

Regards,

Christer

On 17/03/17 17:23, "Ben Campbell" <ben(_at_)nostrum(_dot_)com> wrote:

(as an individual)

I recognize we have not been consistent, but I also favor using the IESG
address for this sort of thing. It's one of the least ephemeral contacts
we have. Individuals change addresses and responsibilities. Some people
use WG lists, but we have more than one WG list kept open way beyond its
otherwise useful life because of registrations that pointed to it.

Thanks!

Ben.

On 17 Mar 2017, at 10:09, Christer Holmberg wrote:

Hi,

Since this document is going to be standards-track, I think the
contact
for the dtls-id registration should be the IESG instead of the
author.

Personally I don¹t have a strong preference, but there are a number
of
similar RFCs where the author is listed. A 30 second search gives me
RFC
4853, RFC 4574Š

In another RFC (sorry, I closed the browser tab and forgot the number)
the
WG chair mail address was listed.

So, it seems like there is no strict rule.

Regards,

Christer



On Mar 17, 2017, at 9:18 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
wrote:


The IESG has received a request from the Multiparty Multimedia
Session
Control WG (mmusic) to consider the following document:
- 'Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS'
 <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to
the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2017-04-06. Exceptionally, 
comments
may
be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  This document defines the SDP offer/answer procedures for
negotiating
  and establishing a DTLS association.  The document also defines
the
  criteria for when a new DTLS association must be established.  The
  document updates RFC 5763 and RFC 7345, by replacing common SDP
  offer/answer procedures with a reference to this specification.

  This document defines a new SDP media-level attribute, 'dtls-id'.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.