Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

Robert,

> Correct me if I am missing someting but the entire debate is not about 
> describing or not header insertion.
>
> I am under assumption that originating hosts still can legally insert it.
>
> It is all about to modify EH in flight - right ? Moreover concerns raised are 
> about side effects of it like MTU .. not lack of instructions on how to 
> insert, modify or remove EH elements.
>
> So what exactly are you expecting WG to deliver as next step if 2460bis goes 
> fwd ? Is detecting the max MTU on end to end path even in 6man's charter ?
You can write a new protocol specification independently of 2460bis that does 
whatever it has to do, and then we can argue over that document on its own 
merits.

Cheers,
Ole

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP