Even if we treat encapsulation in new IPv6 header as only an option ?
Thx
R.
On Mar 31, 2017 12:46, "Suresh Krishnan"
<suresh(_dot_)krishnan(_at_)ericsson(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Mar 31, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert(_at_)raszuk(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Hi Suresh,
As you requested one of many quotes from the draft which your
clarification to 2460bis directly contradicts with:
This include either:
A host originating an IPv6 packet.
*An SR domain ingress router encapsulating a received IPv6 packet
into an outer IPv6 header followed by an SRH.*
Excellent. Thanks for pointing out the exact text. I can confirm that this
text *is compliant* with the RFC2460bis text.
Thanks
Suresh