ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

2017-03-30 07:45:02
On 30/03/2017 15:59, Leddy, John wrote:

...
If this insert/delete of an SRH is prematurely prohibited;  What is a 
recommended solution to the Real World problem above.  Not use case, we are 
implementing.

Again; I’m worried we are eliminating a tool that may prove very helpful, 
preclude its use in future IETF work and shutdown a path for Innovation in 
Networking,

I've tried to say this before but I'm not sure people are getting it: 

RFC2460bis, if approved as is, draws a line in the sand *for interoperability 
across the whole Internet*. There are reasons for this - PMTUD in any form, any 
future replacement for the unsuccessful IPsec/AH, and all the problems of 
deploying extension headers that are understood by some nodes and not by 
others. 

There is no reason why a subsequent standards-track document cannot allow 
header insertion (and removal) within finite domains where the above issues do 
not apply. In fact, an improved version of 
draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-00 could become exactly that.

There doesn't need to be a tussle here. 

   Brian Carpenter


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>