On 16 March 2017 at 03:16, Brian E Carpenter
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Stefano,
On 16/03/2017 04:55, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
...
In the mean time, I think it is way too premature to come to conclusion on
what text should be used for RFC2460bis and I recommend that the current
text is left unchanged until we figured out what to do with EH insertion.
I believe that we have figured it out: extension header insertion is harmful
to Internet interoperability.
I and others were going to work on an ID describing why, however the
other co-authors seem to have disappeared. I'll start putting together
what I have over the next week.
Regards,
Mark.
I fully agree with Suresh's understanding of the rough consensus.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------