Why does this I-D make no mention of YANG 1.1, which has been around for
a while now (albeit not superseding YANG 1.0)?
Has the YANG module been validated against YANG 1.1?
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 4:23 PM
The IESG has received a request from the Routing Area Working Group WG
(rtgwg) to consider the following document:
- 'Routing Key Chain YANG Data Model'
<draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-15.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2017-04-07. Exceptionally, comments
may
be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document describes the key chain YANG data model. A key chain
is a list of elements each containing a key string, send lifetime,
accept lifetime, and algorithm (authentication or encryption). By
properly overlapping the send and accept lifetimes of multiple key
chain elements, key strings and algorithms may be gracefully
updated.
By representing them in a YANG data model, key distribution can be
automated. Key chains are commonly used for routing protocol
authentication and other applications. In some applications, the
protocols do not use the key chain element key directly, but rather
a
key derivation function is used to derive a short-lived key from
the
key chain element key (e.g., the Master Keys used in the TCP
Authentication Option.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.