ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The CIA mentions us

2017-03-07 12:35:48


On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Fernando Gont wrote:

On 03/07/2017 01:23 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 3/7/17 8:08 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:02:54AM -0500,
 Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill(_at_)hallambaker(_dot_)com> wrote
 a message of 54 lines which said:

This is all really good advice. I think it should be published as an
RFC.
I suspect we may run into IPR problems. The CIA author did not read
the Note Well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government

Well... one would still need to assess whether such work is official or
not. :-)  At times, intelligence agency's work is not official --
actually, officially, such work didn't happen. :-)

Yeah, leaked classified materials don't need a copyright for protection.
One can go to jail with out ever getting a chance to discuss copyright
status.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>