[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Real DMARC damage

2017-04-29 21:13:14
It sounds like there would be benefit to fixing the mailman to not consider
policy bounces as unsub worthy, at least.

On Apr 29, 2017 6:15 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty" <
kathleen(_dot_)moriarty(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 29, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

Am I the only IETF list admin who's had to deal with genuine DMARC
damage today?

No, we had one on the SecDir list as well.


gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org had four subscriptions suspended for excessive
bounces, all caused
by mail from one participant whose sending domain has published a
p=reject policy

Bizarrely, one of the subscriptions disabled was It's a
very strange
choice for them to respect p=reject.

  Brian Carpenter

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>