It sounds like there would be benefit to fixing the mailman to not consider
policy bounces as unsub worthy, at least.
On Apr 29, 2017 6:15 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty" <
kathleen(_dot_)moriarty(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Am I the only IETF list admin who's had to deal with genuine DMARC
damage today?
No, we had one on the SecDir list as well.
Kathleen
gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org had four subscriptions suspended for excessive
bounces, all caused
by mail from one participant whose sending domain has published a
p=reject policy
Bizarrely, one of the subscriptions disabled was @gmane.org. It's a
very strange
choice for them to respect p=reject.
Regards
Brian Carpenter