On 30/04/2017 14:10, Brandon Long wrote:
It sounds like there would be benefit to fixing the mailman to not consider
policy bounces as unsub worthy, at least.
Possibly. For now I've increased the bounce threshold on the list, but
that is hardly a solution. (It isn't an unsub, just delivery suspension,
but that's still a problem for all concerned - sender, subscriber, and
list admin.)
Brian
On Apr 29, 2017 6:15 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty" <
kathleen(_dot_)moriarty(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Am I the only IETF list admin who's had to deal with genuine DMARC
damage today?
No, we had one on the SecDir list as well.
Kathleen
gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org had four subscriptions suspended for excessive
bounces, all caused
by mail from one participant whose sending domain has published a
p=reject policy
Bizarrely, one of the subscriptions disabled was @gmane.org. It's a
very strange
choice for them to respect p=reject.
Regards
Brian Carpenter