I have no substantive comments, but have noticed, among other things, a few
somewhat inconsequential typos that could nevertheless impact readability,
particularly for those for whom English is a second language:
• Page 3, penultimate bullet: s/by network operator/by a network operator
• Why is figure 1 on page 5 when it is first referenced at the top of page 4?
• Section 2.1, second paragraph (2 typos): s/peole or extarnal/people or
external
• Section 2.1, last paragraph: I don't understand the second sentence that
starts: “Although it provides information …”
• Section 2.2, second paragraph: i don't understand the first sentence that
starts: “Although the [RFC7950], [RFC7950] …”
• Section 3.3, second paragraph: s/include ability/include the ability
• Section 6: small point but I believe the second acknowledgement should be
me(!), “Jonathan Hansford”, not “David”
Jonathan
=O)
On 1 May 2017, 03:32 +0100, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>,
wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the NETCONF Data Modeling Language
WG (netmod) to consider the following document:
- 'YANG Module Classification'
<draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> as Informational
RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2017-05-14. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
The YANG data modeling language is currently being considered for a
wide variety of applications throughout the networking industry at
large. Many standards-defining organizations (SDOs), open source
software projects, vendors and users are using YANG to develop and
publish YANG modules for a wide variety of applications. At the same
time, there is currently no well-known terminology to categorize
various types of YANG modules.
A consistent terminology would help with the categorization of YANG
modules, assist in the analysis of the YANG data modeling efforts in
the IETF and other organizations, and bring clarity to the YANG-
related discussions between the different groups.
This document describes a set of concepts and associated terms to
support consistent classification of YANG modules.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod