ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Comments on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-11

2017-05-05 14:45:33
Ho


On 5/5/17 9:28 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
I have not yet heard anyone publicly say this document should not be
published, and I find it a bit disingenuous to construe requests for
improvement in such a way. <https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman>

What is disingenuous is reviewing a document to death, requiring
consensus on people's expressed concerns, and then claiming, “oh no,
we're not stopping publication”.

Eliot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature