Dear Zhen,
Thanks very much for your review.
We will update the draft based on the comments and submit a new revision.
best
Jiazi
On 9 May 2017, at 10:47, Zhen Cao <zhencao(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Reviewer: Zhen Cao
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for this draft. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherds should treat these comments
just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors
and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have
been received. For more details of the INT directorate, see
<http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html>.
I believe this document is ready to publish almost as it is.
One issue I found during my review lies in Sec. 8.4 where IPv4 loose
source routing being discussed. To avoid unnecessary fragmentation, I
am suggesting the following wording change:
S/ If the length of the path (n) is greater than MAX_SRC_HOPS
(Section 5), only the "key" routers in the path are kept...
/ If the length of the path (n) is greater than MAX_SRC_HOPS
(Section 5), or the adding of source routing header exceeds the
path MTU,
only the "key" routers in the path are kept...
Cheers,
Zhen