Re: [v6ops] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-00

Hi David,

> Prompted by this review, I reread the document and found what I think are a
> couple additional typos.
>
> Section 4.2, Prefix Value, compares two options: 64:ff9a:ffff:ffff::/48 and
> 64:ff9b:1::/48. However in the fifth paragraph of the section, I believe
> there are two errant references to 64:ff9b:1::/96, that should instead
> be 64:ff9b:1::/48,
> unless I'm misunderstanding the intent of the paragraph.
You're absolutely right. Fixed. Thank you!

Tore