Hi Russ, thanks for your review and my apologies for the delayed reply.
On 5/31/17 2:10 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2017-05-31
IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-13
IESG Telechat date: 2017-07-06
Summary: Ready
Major Concerns: None
Minor Concerns: None
Nits:
Section 2.3 includes this note:
Note: An entity SHOULD NOT apply the Case Mapping Rule during
enforcement, because typically it is appropriate only during
comparison.
I question the inclusion of "typically" in this note. Can you simply
say that the Case Mapping Rule SHOULD only be used during comparison?
That seems better, yes!
Peter