ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?

2017-06-26 22:29:49
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 06:12:39PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2017-06-26 17:14, Stewart Bryant wrote:
  I diligently included in a draft the updated "RFC2119" boilerplate 
which includes the reference to RFC8174.

Nits then complains that it does not like the RFC2119 text (which is cut 
and paste from a very recent RFC).

So which is right, nits or the RFC Editor?
...

Seems that idnits needs an update.

Seems that it does, indeed.

And perhaps Stewart should look at the Errata for RFC 2119, if he has not 
already.

-Ben