Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?

ietf

Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?

2017-06-28 03:13:09

On 2017-06-27 10:45, Barry Leiba wrote:

Henrik is aware that idnits needs to be updated, and is working on
that.  He's been in contact with me about it.  (I actually thought
he'd already put the fix up, but I guess not.)

Barry


Is accepting non-ASCII characters on the TODO list as well?

Best regards, Julian

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Stewart Bryant Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Julian Reschke Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Benjamin Kaduk Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Gmail Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Benjamin Kaduk Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Julian Reschke Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Barry Leiba Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Julian Reschke <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Julian Reschke
Next by Date:	Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis-02, Stewart Bryant
Previous by Thread:	Re: Which is the right "RFC2119" Boilerplate?, Barry Leiba
Next by Thread:	Side Meeting Room Reservations at IETF 99, IETF Secretariat
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]