I don't mean to open a discussion into that topic here—I realize that there is
no consensus on it, and that this position is not shared by various people, yourself
included. I just want to point out that you've expressed it as universally true that
people think special-use names are bad, and that is not in fact the case: if it were,
we wouldn't need to publish this document.
I didn't say they're bad, I said they're a problem which is not the same
thing.
It really isn't helpful to rephrase other people's statements and get them
wrong, particularly when everyone can just read the original.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly