I don't mean to open a discussion into that topic here—I realize that there is
no consensus on it, and that this position is not shared by various people, yourself
included. I just want to point out that you've expressed it as universally true that
people think special-use names are bad, and that is not in fact the case: if it were,
we wouldn't need to publish this document.
I didn't say they're bad, I said they're a problem which is not the same
It really isn't helpful to rephrase other people's statements and get them
wrong, particularly when everyone can just read the original.
John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly