Re: Message Routing Philosophy

mail-ng

Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model

2004-02-01 16:32:22



On Feb 1, 2004, at 1:55 PM, Doug Royer wrote:

Most (all?) IM systems require one or more hubs that track users
and setup the transfer for point to point or transfer all messages
through the hub. Not a practical model for email.


go study Jabber. MSN and AIM are not the be-all and end-all here.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Paul Crowley Re: Message Routing Philosophy, James Craig Burley Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: Message Routing Philosophy, James Craig Burley Re: Message Routing Philosophy, william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Chuq Von Rospach Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Paul Crowley Re: Message Routing Philosophy, James Craig Burley Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Chuq Von Rospach Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Doug Royer Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Chuq Von Rospach <= Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Doug Royer Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Chuq Von Rospach

Previous by Date:	Re: a few short notes, Chuq Von Rospach
Next by Date:	Re: Message Routing Philosophy, James Craig Burley
Previous by Thread:	Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Doug Royer
Next by Thread:	Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Doug Royer
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]