mail-ng
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Less is more

2004-04-28 02:27:18

At 20:57 27/04/04 +0100, Mike Higginbottom wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:40:13 -0400, Keith Moore 
<moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> wrote:

I'm not sure what mail-ng could do to solve those problems while still
retaining a useful date field.

How about a single restricted format selected from the somewhat excessive
range offered by ISO8601 e.g. 2004-04-27T20:55:00+0100

Maybe this is really off-topic, too detailed for the intended debate of this list, but since it seems it won't fade away I feel I must just mention:
  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>