No, the reference in section 4 is to purported local A-Rs, not foreign A-Rs.
Perhaps the problem is a mismatch in how I'm interpreting the words
"foreign A-R". I took it to mean an A-R referencing a different
hostname. Are you meaning something totally different?
Tony
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Tony Hansen wrote:
Where does it say that foreign A-Rs are to be removed? I don't see that
anywhere in the spec.
In section 4:
"For security reasons, an MTA SHOULD remove ..."
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html