John Levine wrote:
Well, sure. That's basically the as-if rule, e.g., you can do your
SPF check wherever you want so long as you get the same result as if
you did it at the border MTA. That's one reason (the other was
sloppiness) why my wording was somewhat vague.
I think your short list of scenarios in the prior message was OK.
OK, but then by my earlier logic, do we even really need to say this at
all? It already says only the agents which do the checks should add the
header. The thing you cited which stated explicitly "border" and
"delivery" MTAs normally do this stuff didn't actually say they're the
only agents that do this stuff.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html