mail-vet-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[mail-vet-discuss] authentication-results grammar w.r.t. propspec

2007-10-22 13:10:37
I've noticed that a number of implementations haven't been putting in a
propspec when the result is a failure. And I think this may be the
correct thing to do in certain cases.

If this is the consensus of the group, then this change to the ABNF
would be in order, to make propspec optional:

old:      header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
old:               [CFWS] *(";" methodspec propspec [CFWS])

new:      header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
new:               [CFWS] *(";" methodspec [propspec CFWS])

        Tony
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>