At 17:28 21-01-2008, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Someone has asked for "none" to be added as a possible result for an
authentication method. An example use of this might be a message
not signed with DKIM, and a DKIM verification agent that wants to be
very explicit that it processed the message and that the message was
unsigned. One could argue though that this is redundant to
"neutral", which we already have, or that the implementor would
simply omit to add the header altogether in those cases.
That example falls under neutral currently as there were no errors
and the agent could not make any positive or negative assessment.
Could the text for "none" be posted?
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html