Re: [mail-vet-discuss] "none" as a possible result string?

On Tuesday 22 January 2008 21:23, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Sounds good.  I'll put through a "-11" draft with the following simple
> changes:
>
> - MUAs MUST ignore methods they don't know

Why limit it to MUAs.  I'd think this is generally true.  

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html