SM wrote:
Essentially, that's what it boils down to: a more precise
Introduction and a more lengthy Security Considerations, and then a
number of lesser tweaks throughout the document.
I read it as much more than that.
Why? It seemed to me at the end that he didn't feel the whole idea
should be tossed out as long as I can add commentary on the five major
risks he enumerated at the end. I've already sent him back some
proposed wording changes that cover each of those concerns, but I
probably won't hear back until next week as to whether or not those
changes will be sufficient to earn an "all clear".
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html