At 16:26 29-01-2008, J D Falk wrote:
Have the same concerns been raised in other WGs for the possibility that somebody might hack into an IMAP server and modify messages there?
I thought of that as I read that part of the review. The difference is that this header introduces the element of trust.
Regards,-sm
_______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] secdir review of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-11.txt (fwd), SM |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] secdir review ofdraft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-11.txt (fwd), Murray S. Kucherawy |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [mail-vet-discuss] secdir review ofdraft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-11.txt (fwd), J D Falk |
Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] secdir review ofdraft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-11.txt (fwd), Dave Crocker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |